AUSTRALIAN FREEDOM FOUNDATION

 

NEWSLETTER AUGUST 2010

Don’t Let Joolya Foolya!

Following Labor’s preference deal with the Water Melon Greens (Green on the outside, red on the inside) it is likely that the Greens will hold the balance of power in the Senate. The Labor Party in return will enjoy Green preferences and retain many marginal seats in the House of Representatives allowing it to continue in Government. The Liberals will have to rely heavily on the preferences of several minor parties if they hope to Govern. However the Coalition will face a hostile senate

Since the Greens will possibly hold the balance of power.

If the Greens achieve their objectives then it will have serious consequences for Australia.

Julia Gillard has long stood for anti-family, anti life Feminist agenda’s and she will be pushed further in this direction by the Greens who are to the left of the ALP on issues such as the mining tax, closing down the coal industry, the environment, agriculture, forestry, abortion, drug legalization, euthanasia, gayrights, and other issues.

The left dominated media would have us believe that Julia is a mainstream centrist leader, almost conservative in most of her views but her past political affiliations with the extreme left, betray her true intentions. M/s Gillard has been a prominent figure in Labor’s left wing feminist caucus, Emily’s list, which aims to promote "progressive" pro abortion women to Parliament. As a university student she was elected as the Australian Union of Students (AUS ) President in 1983. During her tenure in this position the AUS declined to recognize the rights of religious clubs or Societies to express their views on Campus or to have access to Campus facilities. In 1983 the AUS declared "The International Year of the Lesbian" It also adopted a policy on prostitution claiming that "Prostitution in marriage is the transaction of sex in return for love, security, and housekeeping. Anti AUS students produced a poster with the slogan " The AUS says your mother is a prostitute" .

As a prominent figure in the left wing militant Socialist Forum which was formed from disaffected members of the Communist Party Julia Gillard campaigned to have Australia removed from the ANZUS Alliance and to twin Melbourne with Lenningrad (renamed St Petersburg since the socalled demise of Communism}

In typical Fabian Socialist fashion she recommends "patient gradualism" to achieve socialist goals. She believes the Social changes she wants can be achieved by a long period of Labor Administration and a willingness of the Socialist Left to accept unpalatable compromises in order to bolster the prospect of future advances. In other words she proposes to "Move Forward" by taking Two steps forward and one step backward.

The emblem of the Fabian Society is a wolf in sheep’s clothing so when you see Julia nursing a baby on the political hustings in an attempt to boost a family friendly image remember her radical past. She has actively supported organizations which aim to destroy the unborn and traditional family values. She is in every sense Ä wolf in sheep’s clothing". So don’t let Joolya Foolya"!

HEATHER HILL & JULIA GILLARD

Over 10 years ago Heather Hill , a One Nation Senate Candidate was denied a seat in the Federal Parliament. She had migrated to Australia as a child of parents who had British Citizenship. Julia Gillard migrated to Australia about the same time and her parents enjoyed British citizenship. Heather Hill was unable to take her seat in the Senate because she had not renounced her British Citizenship at the time of nomination.

We believe that there are several other politicians on both sides of the political fence who currently hold dual citizenship and may not be validly sitting in Parliament . Among questions which we might ask is "Does a bi-partisan agreement

Exist between the major parties which aims at concealing citizenship matters of members.? Would the media and the Australian Electoral Commission investigate a complaint that raised this matter. in relation to specific politicians

If you take the time you can find out for yourself.!

The undermentioned letter has been drafted by a Constitutional Lawyer and we suggest you write to your local paper and also the Electoral Commissioner in your State requesting an early response. This must be done within the next 30 days to be valid.

Dear Sir,

Is Julia Gillard validly a Member of Parliament?

On 23 June 1999 the High Court ruled that Heather Hill could not validly hold the seat in the Australian Senate to which she had been elected. Mrs Hill was born in the United Kingdom on 9th August 1960. Under British Law, birth in Britain normally confers UK citizenship. British citizenship ceases on registration of a declaration of renunciation. Mrs Hill became an Australian citizen and pledged her "loyalty to Australia and its people, whose democratic beliefs I share, whose rights and liberties I respect, and whose laws I will uphold and obey". She applied for and obtained an Australian Passport. At the time of her election to the Senate no renunciation of British Citizenship by Mrs Hill had been registered. .

The problem for Mrs Hill was that section 44 of the Australian Constitution declares that a person holding citizenship or rights of citizenship in a foreign country (including the UK) is ineligible to be a member of the Senate or House of Representatives. The fact that Mrs Hill was an Australian citizen was not in doubt. The issue was whether she could hold dual citizenship, to which the High Court answered "no".

My question is "Has Julia Gillard renounced British citizenship in the proper form and has the renunciation been registered? "

THE LAST SENTENCE IS THE IMPORTANT ONE… AND WE ARE CHALLENGING THE AEC TO SEEK THE TRUTH OF THIS MATTER !

MY MATE ROGER !

Roger had a steady job with ETSA. He enjoyed good health and was engaged to be married. Within a few months of the date fixed for the wedding his girl friend broke the engagement. This event had a traumatic effect on Roger.

He made the decision to cease work and to never work again.

This happened over 50 years ago and to my knowledge he has kept his vow.

Following the broken engagement Roger, who lived at home, decided to create his own living quarters. He did this by digging a large hole in the backyard and moving his limited chattels into his underground home.

In order to qualify for Government benefits Roger had to obtain medical certificates from his Doctor. This did not present a problem He was prescribed Vallium and became depressed as he walked the streets of his home town leading his faithful Border Collie dog. The people called him "Rodger the dodger" but this did not seem to worry him in the least.

At that time I was making regular trips to various country towns so I asked him to accompany me as it would give him and opportunity to break the monotony of his daily routine and also assist me with some light lifting work which was sometimes necessary His family later advised me that Roger would have sleepless nights and breakout in cold sweats if he thought he may have to actually do some work.

Roger was powerfully built, well able to work, but he had resolved not to work and to live off the tax payer. He has succeeded in doing that. But Roger was not stupid.! He realized that his lifestyle and others who shared his views could only be supported over the long term if there was a strong and prosperous economy. He always voted for the Liberals as he believed that should Labor hold power long enough they would bankrupt the economy and thus destroy the goose that laid the golden eggs.

Times have changed.! We now have a situation where there is little difference between Liberal and Labor. Despite Labor’s spendthrift ways the Liberals have realized that if they are to govern they must outbid them because Australia has reached a point where there are more people voting for a living than working for a Living.! This is not new so what does History teach us about the eventual outcome of such policies?

English Statesman Alexander Tyler wrote 400 years ago " Ä democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of Government. It can last only until voters discover that they can vote themselves largess out of the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury- with the result that democracies always collapse over a loose fiscal policy, always to be followed by DICTATORSHIP!

PLANNED DESTRUCTION !

Any moderately sane person would support the view that it is unwise to spend more than you can earn. Many reject this commonsense view and found that wild spending can lead to bankruptcy and the selling off of assets at fire sale prices. In like manner Governments can not over a long term continue to spend more than they can take in through taxes and other charges They may borrow or even print money to meet their obligations but eventually this will lead to inflation of the currency and bankruptcy as lenders sense danger and begin to offload their investments.

This basic reasoning is obvious even to a grade 6 Primary school student but many of our media chattering class and political leaders fail to grasp it.

But wait , are our politicians that dumb.? I think not!. Supposing it was the intention of a political party in power to deliberately undermine the economy. Would not wild spending and heavy taxing be just the tool to use as a weapon of destruction. English politician Margaret Thatcher expressed that thought when she called the opposing Labor Party "the destroyers" But why would anyone want to destroy the economy of a prosperous nation.? Could there be a hidden agenda?

Many years ago Adam Weishaupt, founder of the infamous Order of the Illuminati claimed that in order to build his New World Order it was first necessary to destroy

The old order. This meant that he wished to first destroy established institutions, abolish true religion, destroy elected Governments and then build his "World Government" on the ashes of the old society.

Members of his secret society later employed Karl Marx to write a manifesto which could be used as a blue print for revolutionaries.

In the early 1950’s the American Senate was concerned about the activities of some of the large Tax exempt foundations who were financing various Communist activities in the USA. They appointed independent investigator Norman Dodd who approached the head of the Ford Foundation (Rowan Gaither) and was told that he was under directives from the white house to use Ford’s grant making powers to so change life in the USA that it could be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union. The American public were never advised of this committees findings. Such a long term plan had to be carried out using extreme cunning, brilliant deception in order that Americans could be forced to surrender their rights and embrace a collectivist Socialist Society. It is therefore reasonable to ask what have the New World Order Socialist Planners achieved in America and Australia over the past 50 years?

THEY HAVE DESTROYED TRADITIONAL FAMILY VALUES by

  1. Forcing Women into the work force and to abandon their role as mothers and home makers.
  2. They have promoted easy divorce, abortion, homosexuality etc etc.
  3. They have undermined our youth by promoting easy access to drugs, sexual perversion and dumbing down in schools and Universities.

THEY HAVE ATTACKED & UNDERMINED OUR GOVERNMENT by

a. By by passing our Constitution and ceding power and Sovereignty to the UN .. and other international bodies.

  1. By wild spending and heavy taxing and abandoning our Manufacturers and

    Primary producers to slave labour economies in Asia & India.

  2. By supporting new legislation at variance with the Christian principles embodied in our Constitution

DESTROYING RELIGION.

a. Undermining our Christian culture by deliberately encouraging migration from foreign cultures which are hostile to Christianity.

b. By abandoning Religious instruction in public schools.

c. By fostering a cynical attitude toward true religion through teaching and the media.

Australians need to realize that Socialist planners are at war with Society. They have enjoyed success because most Australians have been too lazy ,or not taken action to organize themselves into an effective opposition.

REFUGEES & ILLEGALS.

A major problem facing the Australian Government is the continuing inflow of Illegal refugees through our Northern Borders.

What is being done to stop them and what proposals are on the table to deal with those already held in detention camps.?

There is no doubt that Australia is an attractive destination for refugees. Once they gain a footing on Australian soil they become eligible for a range of welfare benefits which in many cases exceed those available to Australian families. But how do you stop them coming.?

The Labor party claims that a processing centre should be built in East Timor- but the Government in East Timor totally rejects this proposal and believes Julia Gillard is misleading the Australian people if she thinks East Timor will accept her proposal.

The Liberals want to re open the centre at Nauru and is currently negotiating with the Government of that country. But the question remains as to how you might stop this inflow of would be migrants.

We believe that there are two things which need to happen.

a. The illegal people smugglers should be made to face heavy penalties if captured. Currently they receive what amounts to a slap on the wrist before being sent home to later resume their illegal activities.

b. Illegal migrants when taken into custody should be made to serve 5 years on a government sponsored infra structure project. This is how the Snowy river scheme and much of the railway broad gauge network were constructed after World War 2. It is only after serving their time on these projects that they become eligible to apply for Australian Citizenship or receive any welfare benefits.

Finally the Australian Government should have the final say in determining the level of and type of migrant that can be admitted to Australia. At present it appears that our Government is under directives from the UN as our politicians have signed international agreements ceding authority to International UN sponsored bodies. This must cease if we are to control our migrant intake and gain control of our borders.

RETURN TO HOME PAGE